Wednesday, July 30, 2008

What the Hamburglar's Eating Now

"Nobody thinks prison food is haute cuisine, but could it be so bad it's unconstitutional?" Slate magazine taste-tests prison Nutraloaf.

Also in this mien from Jeff Quniton's Inside Charm City: "Satellite TV coming to MD prisons"

6 comments:

John Galt said...

Violating their Eighth Amndment rights?

No, Rat poison would violate their Eighth Amendment rights.

Back to bread and water, thank you.

And cramped cement cells.

They are called criminals for a reason, you know. It's supposed to be a displeasing experience.

The intent of the 'cruel and unusual punishment' provision was to prevent the penal system from serving as a vehicle for torture and recreational cruelty.

The founding fathers certainly envisioned punishing offenders. If only we provided prisons like they had back in 1787...

ppatin said...

If it were up to me every inmate would be fed nutraloaf.

And yeah, the idea that it's unconstitutional is laughable.

I am so wise said...

I think they should be fed their choice of fast food.

Anonymous said...

Well, bread + water would be rather low in protein and I don't think we'd want to end up with a bunch of prisoners with kwashiorkor. But I'm in favor of sticking with the nutraloaf.

John Galt said...

Just to illustrate the point, the DPSCS is installing satellite TV in the cells so as to persuade inmates to stay in their cells.

May I introduce you to the concept of a lock ???

ppatin said...

I heard the satellite TV story on the radio this morning. It made me want to scream.